|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Coalition of Americas Consuming Industries Calls for Sound Policy
Choices in Wake of Steel Bankruptcy
Cleveland, Ohio, January 2, 2001
Commenting on the bankruptcy filing by
LTV Steel Corp., the Consuming Industries Trade Action Coalition (CITAC)
today cautioned that U.S. government policy should focus on sound action
that would benefit LTV workers without hurting workers in downstream industries
that depend on steel to serve world markets.
CITAC is a group of companies and associations
representing Americas consuming industries those companies
and workers that rely on open markets for their raw materials and components.
Our members include major producers and distributors of automobiles, housing
and commercial buildings, wire and wire products, electronic equipment,
heavy machinery, tires, food processing equipment, clothing and textile
products, oil and gas drilling equipment and services, and many other
products.
Jon Jenson, Chairman of CITAC and President Emeritus of Cleveland-based
Precision Metalforming Association, said, All of us are concerned
about the future of LTV and its work force. That concern must not cause
us to overlook the fact that LTV, if it is to survive, must do so based
on its own competitive strength not at the expense of other American
workers.
With this bankruptcy, we are hearing calls for restrictions on
imports of steel, Jenson said. While imports are a convenient
scapegoat, import restrictions are not likely to bring LTV back to profitability.
Instead, steel-consuming industries such as autos, appliances, heavy equipment,
construction and metal fabrication which employ over 40 times more
workers than the steel industry would be deprived of the steel
they need to be globally competitive.
CITAC calls upon Congress and the Administration
to examine carefully the causes of the current crisis at LTV and some
other steel producers around the country, Jenson stressed. The
domestic steel-producing industry too often blames imports for its problems.
But in fact the industry can only meet 75% of domestic demand, and itself
imports foreign steel for its own use in production and fabrication.
For many reasons, arbitrarily restricting imports will cause far
more harm than good, Jenson said. We must seek meaningful
steps to restore the market competitiveness of our steel industry without
locking out the imports our economy needs.
|