 |
| |
|
|
| FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Contact: |
Christina
Bucher |
| June 19, 2001 |
|
The PBN Company |
| |
|
Tel. 202-466-6210 |
| |
|
|
CITAC URGES BUSH ADMINISTRATION TO ENSURE AID TO STEEL
INDUSTRY IS CONSTRUCTIVE FOR ALL AMERICANS
Washington, DC - The Consuming Industries Trade Action Coalition
(CITAC) today proposed a five-point agenda to President George W. Bush
that will ensure that any U.S. Government initiative to assist the domestic
steel industry works "to the advantage of America broadly, rather
than just a few Americans." CITAC is a coalition of U.S. companies
and organizations advocating a trade agenda that features open markets,
expanding world trade and common sense consideration of the needs of America's
consuming industries.
CITAC "is very concerned about the costs to the economy of U.S.
import restrictions," wrote CITAC Chairman Jon Jenson. While opposed
to the initiation of a Section 201 investigation, CITAC proposes a five-point
agenda "to ensure that help for the steel industry is constructive
for all Americans."
The five point agenda includes:
- First, steel consumers
must have a prominent place at the table when the future assistance
to steel producers is discussed. Steel consumers need "full-party
status" in the 201 case and a constructive role when potential
remedies are considered. Consuming industries employ 50 American workers
for every worker employed in steel production. These industries must
not suffer from high prices and shortages as a result of relief for
the domestic steel industry.
- Second, President
Bush should clearly and unequivocally declare the Administration's opposition
to H.R. 808, The "Steel Revitalization Act," and similar Senate
legislation that would impose WTO-illegal quotas on steel imports and
flout the United States' international obligations. H.R. 808 is bad
for America. The bill violates international law and would encourage
steel users to relocate their facilities outside the United States.
- Third, a procedure
must be established to exempt unavailable steel products from quotas,
tariffs or other import restrictions. In hundreds of cases, steel consumers
require steel products that are not made domestically. These products
are highly specialized and essential to production of everything from
automobiles to fire extinguishers. In any 201 relief, it is imperative
that consumers have a process for obtaining the steel they need from
foreign sources when a domestic source is not available.
- Fourth, if Section
201 relief is imposed for any steel product, outstanding trade remedy
measures (e.g., antidumping or countervailing duty orders) on that product
should be eliminated. Quota or tariff remedies under Section 201 must
not be applied along with previous antidumping or countervailing duty
relief, as this could effectively lock needed products out of the U.S.
market with potentially devastating consequences for U.S. steel consumers.
- Fifth, President
Bush should not rush to judgment by imposing quotas on a preliminary
basis. Interim relief prejudges the outcome of the Section 201 process
and forces steel consuming industries to pay the heavy price of protection
before it is clear that protection is warranted. In this case, where
imports of most steel products have declined, interim relief is not
warranted.
"With these common sense measures, assistance for the steel industry
need not devastate downstream industries," concluded Jenson, promising
that CITAC would welcome the opportunity to work with the Administration
and Congress to "reach the best solution to steel problems."
To view CITAC's letter
to President Bush and to obtain additional information on CITAC, please
visit our website at www.citac-trade.org.
|
 |